NCCCS Performance Measures and Standards
View Short Summary PowerPoint of Performance Measures
View Detailed descriptions of the NCCCS Performance Measures and Standards
View a Summary of Changes to Standards for NCCCS Performance Measures from year to year.
View the CFCC Performance Results, 1999-2000
View the CFCC Performance Results, 2000-2001
View the CFCC Performance Results, 2001-2002
View the CFCC Performance Results, 2002-2003
View the CFCC Performance Results, 2003-2004
View the CFCC Performance Results, 2004-2005
View the CFCC Performance Results, 2005-2006
View the CFCC Performance Results, 2006-2007
View the CFCC Performance Results, 2007-2008
View the CFCC Performance Results, 2008-2009
View the CFCC Performance Results Comparison 2003-2008
Return to Institutional Effectiveness Main Menu
Historical Performance Measures 10-Year Trend Data
Performance Measures Summary of Changes
2010 Performance Funding Measures and Standards 6 year comparisons
2010 Critical Success Factors (including graduate employment rates)
CFCC Performance Results Tracking Changes, 2009-10
NCCCS Performance Measures and Standards
CFCC Performance Results, 2009-2010
(Reported Summer, 2011)
In February 1999, in response to a mandate from the NC General Assembly to review past performance and define standards of performance to ensure the quality and effectiveness of programs and services, the NC State Board of Community Colleges adopted 12 performance measures for all 58 community colleges as the core indicators of student success for public accountability purposes.
In 2007, the NC General Assembly approved modifications to the NC Community College Performance Measures and Standards as recommended by the NC State Board of Community Colleges. The modifications, effective immediately, reduced the number of measures from 12 to 8, but require colleges to meet all standards plus †additional criteria for measures 2 and 3 below to qualify for the Exceptional Institutional Performance funding. CFCC’s performance results for 2009-2010 are:
Performance Measure |
Description |
Source of Data |
Standard |
CFCC Performance |
1. Progress of Basic Skills Students
|
The aggregate percentage of adult literacy students completing a level of literacy, progressing within a level of literacy, or completing a predetermined goal. |
Data is submitted on an annual basis from each college into the Literacy Education Information System (LEIS) which is uploaded to the NCCCS Data Warehouse. This data is extracted from the Data Warehouse’s Literacy-College Universe using “Reporting Year” = “2010” and analyzed at the individual student level using the fields “Mover Higher (Y/N)”, Level Completed (Y/N)”, “Progressing (Y/N)”, and “Goal Completed (Y/N)” to determine student progression.
|
75% of adult literacy students will complete a level, progress within a level, or complete a predetermined goal. |
76% progressed
(3,862literacy students served by CFCC)
|
2. Passing Rates on Licensure and Certification Examinations
|
The percentage of first-time test takers passing an examination required for NC licensure or certification prior to practicing the profession. A licensure requirement for an occupation is one that is required by state statute for an individual to work in that occupation. Certification is generally voluntary but may be required by employers or an outside accrediting agency. Purely voluntary examinations are not reported.
|
The number of first-time test-takers and the number passing were provided to the System Office by agencies issuing the license or certification and validated by the colleges. Depending on the exam, data may be provided on a fiscal or calendar year. The institutional passing rate was calculated by dividing the total number of first-time test takers for all reported examinations by the total number of persons who sat for the exam for the first time. For privacy and statistical validity, no examination data are reported when the number of first-time test takers is fewer than 10. |
80% of first-time test takers will pass examinations required for North Carolina licensure or certification.
†Additional criteria to qualify for the Exceptional Institutional Performance Standard—The college will have no exam with a passing rate less than 70%. |
Individual scores: Cosmetology-* Cosmetology Apprentice-100% (11 tested) Manicurist-* Esthetics-* Dental Hygiene-100% (11 tested) Radiography – 100% (22 tested) PN-100% (19 tested) ADN-98% (57 tested) EMT-95% (172 tested) EMT-P-* EMT-I-87% (15 tested) BLET-84% (85 tested) Real Estate Sales-83% (12 Tested)
*= number too small to report without violating privacy laws †CFCC met additional criteria for this measure |
3. Performance of College Transfer Students
|
Of students transferring to a university with an associate degree or 24 articulated college transfer credit hours, the percentage who have a GPA equal or greater than 2.00 after two semesters at the university. |
Lists of students enrolled in 2008-2009 receiving an associate degree during that academic year and those who had accumulated at least 24 articulated college transfer credit hours data were sent to UNCGA. These lists were matched against fall 2009 and spring 2010 UNC system student records to determine transfer enrollment at a NC public university and first year academic performance. Detailed reports by community college can be accessed at http://www.northcarolina.edu/ira/ir/analytics/tsp.htm . Two reports for each college were accessed from this site for this measure: First-Year UNC Academic Performance of 2008-09 Community College Associate Degree Recipients and First-Year UNC Academic Performance of 2008-09 Community College Students with at Least 24 Semester Hours of Community College Coursework. Data from D.4. Percent of Students with End-of-Year GPA=>2.00 in these reports were combined to determine the overall percentage of transfers with a GPA equal to or greater than 2.00 after two semesters at the university. Community colleges are allowed to supplement this data with acquired performance data from private and out-of-state institutions that is consistent with the methodology employed by the UNCGA in calculating the data for transfer to public universities. |
83% of students transferring to a university with an associate degree or 24 articulated college transfer credit hours will have a GPA equal to or greater than 2.00 after 2 semesters at the university.
†Additional criteria to qualify for the Exceptional Institutional Performance Standard—Meet or exceed the aggregate performance of native UNC sophomores and juniors, which is 87% for this year. |
87%- Associate Degree recipients had a 2.0 GPA or higher
84%- Transfers w/o degree but transferring with 24 or more semester hours had a 2.0 GPA or higher
85% of all qualifying transfer students achieved a GPA of 2.0 or better
|
4. Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses |
The percentage of developmental course completers in English, reading or mathematics completing with a grade “C” or better. |
At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file which is uploaded to the NCCCS Data Warehouse. Grade data in the Data Warehouse’s Curriculum Student Info II Universe was extracted by filtering “Course Prefix” equal to “ENG;MAT;RED”, “Course Number” less than “100”, and Reporting Term equal to “200903;201001;201002” and analyzed based on data in the fields “Letter Grade” and “College Letter Grade”. While all grades were extracted for analysis, only grades that equated to “A”, “B”, “C”, “D”, or “F” were counted as completers. Other grades include those that equate to withdraw, incomplete, audit, transfer credit, etc. Results were shared and verified with institutions to ensure proper grade mapping. |
75% of developmental course completers in English, reading or mathematics will complete with a grade “C” or better. |
78% (of 4,366) combined, English and Math
79% (of 1,629) completed English with a “C” or better
77% (of 2,737) completed math with a “C” or better |
5. Success Rates of Developmental Students in Subsequent College-Level Courses |
Among developmental completers subsequently completing a college level English or mathematics course, the percentage passing the college level English or mathematics course with a grade of “D” or better. Specifically, the performance of those who took developmental English and/or reading courses and subsequently took college-level English courses was assessed. Likewise, the performance of those who took developmental math courses and then took college-level math courses was also assessed. |
At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file which is uploaded to the NCCCS Data Warehouse. Grade date in the Data Warehouse’s Curriculum Student Info II Universe was extracted by filtering “Course Prefix” equal to “ENG;MAT”, “Course Number” less than or equal to “100”, and Reporting Term equal to “200903;201001;201002” and analyzed based on data in the fields “Letter Grade” and “College Letter Grade”. While all grades were extracted for analysis, only grades that equated to “A”,”B”,”C”,”D”, or “F” were counted as completers. These grades were matched to students who had previously taken developmental English, Reading, and/or Math courses. |
80% of college level English or mathematics course completers with previous developmental coursework will complete the college level English or mathematics course with a grade of “D” or better. |
79% (1,092) combined, English and Math
78% (of 611) completed in subsequent college-level English courses
79% (of 481) completed in subsequent college-level math courses |
6. Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non-Completers |
The percentage of graduates and early-leavers “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the overall quality of the college. |
Data was collected from a Completer Survey and a Non-Completer Survey that were developed and administered at the individual colleges. Many of the questions included on the surveys are required by the System Office, including a question on the “Overall quality of the college” with satisfaction options of “very satisfied”, “satisfied”, “dissatisfied”, and “very dissatisfied”. Completer Surveys were administered to students graduating in the 2009-2010 academic year. Non-Completer Surveys were administered to credential-seeking students in Fall 2009 who were not enrolled in Fall 2010 and had not graduated. Colleges are required to report a statistically valid response rate. The overall satisfaction rates were calculated by dividing the total number of respondents ”very satisfied” or satisfied” with the “Overall quality of the college” by the total number of question responses. |
90% of exiting students will be “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the overall quality of the college.
|
Total: 98% of the combined respondents (1,577) reported satisfaction
97% (of 328) CFCC non-completers reported satisfaction
98% (of 1,249) completers reported satisfaction
|
7. Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation and Transfer |
The percentage of fall credential-seeking students who have graduated or are still enrolled at the same college, a university, or another community college one year later. |
At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CFPFAR) data file which is uploaded to the NCCCS Data Warehouse. Student enrollment data in the Data Warehouse’s Curriculum Student Info II Universe was extracted by filtering “Curriculum Type Desc” equal to “Associate;Certificate;Diploma” and “Reporting Term” equal to “200903”. This fall 2009 list of students was matched against those with a “Date Graduated in Curriculum” between “o7/01/2009” and “12/31/2010” to determine those graduating. The fall 2009 list was also matched against those with “Reporting Term” equal to “201003” in either the Data Warehouse’s Curriculum Student Info II or Con-Ed Universe (with “Funding Code Area” equal to “03” or “04”) to determine fall 2010 enrollments in either curriculum or occupational extension programs, Finally, the fall 2009 list was sent to the National Student Clearinghouse to identify those who transferred to a college or university outside of the NC Community College System. The combined data set was analyzed to determine which students from the fall 2009 list had “graduated”, “returned but did not graduate”, “transferred but did not graduate or return”, or “did not graduate, return, or transfer”. |
65% of fall credential-seeking students will graduate, remain enrolled at the same college, or transfer to a university or another community college one year later. |
72% graduated, are still enrolled, or transferred.
Total cohort was 8,109 with 14% graduated, 51% returned the following fall, and 7% transferred. |
8. Client Satisfaction with Customized Training |
Percentage of Clients receiving specialized training programs and services through Customized Training and Small Business Centers satisfied with training. |
Surveys administered to clients receiving services through Customized Training Program projects and Business & Industry Support training activities, and from Small Business Centers were administered by colleges to determine level of satisfaction with training. The data is submitted annually to the System Office at the end of the fiscal year. Satisfaction for each of these surveys are based on a five point scale with satisfaction being based on the highest two points. |
90% of clients receiving specialized training programs and services through Customized Training and Small Business Centers will be satisfied with training. |
95% satisfied
(1,810 clients responded to the survey) |